see Y:D 117 at end of siman, isur drabanan has no issur schora
see shacch there sk 14 that stam yayin should be worse because of issur hanah
see however Y:D 123:1 rama that bzman hazeh there is no issur hanah maikar hadin
thr rama there brins mekilim to do sechora with stam yayin, see there pischei tshuva 2 that the custom is to be lenient in this regard
even acc to the machmirim there it would seem for a present one could be maikel
Why isn’t there a problem with oiseh sechoiro bidevorim hoasurim?
see Y:D 117 at end of siman, isur drabanan has no issur schora
see shacch there sk 14 that stam yayin should be worse because of issur hanah
see however Y:D 123:1 rama that bzman hazeh there is no issur hanah maikar hadin
thr rama there brins mekilim to do sechora with stam yayin, see there pischei tshuva 2 that the custom is to be lenient in this regard
even acc to the machmirim there it would seem for a present one could be maikel
Leave a comment